My punctuation and spelling are as intented,
versus not exactly clear.
From a discussion[*] on the Wiemar Republic and the issue of gun control springs the economic impact in the Treaty of Versailles*, the word Realpolitik, crept into my search which landed me on Noopolitik which brought me this source on a letter and this reference to Fred Kaplan. (My earlier comment on similar material including Fred Kaplan.)
[To be update as well as linked to economics--not to mention boat and recent links:
Humpty Dumpty
"Trust but verify"
Atlas
American Exceptionalism!]
* no pun on vs or vs., nor reliance on this article per se.
[bold links for referenced revisiting and no slouches embedded there]
[A Plan to B-Team: upgraded in progress]
[especially naught / exactly]
[*] this is not necessarily the discussion but the source was the Thom Hartmann show last week to which I had my own contribution via the ethernet, I might per se.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query S.E.. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query S.E.. Sort by date Show all posts
Monday, April 13, 2009
Friday, March 21, 2014
Ouroboros
Dimentions
WSM
Consciousness is too cubed.
SE 3-21-2014
Happy SE [!]
44 ?
dot Facetious D-wag
dot No Bell
dot Math is next
Period Harmony*
Light Speed
Trigger Alert
* divergent 5 OW(no clue ! )
Friday, March 01, 2013
FOOTNOTES MARCH 2013
3-14-13 : interesting digs Six Links
(b.s.) "S.E.(vi)" A. (fn)FOR D... , B. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy , C. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)].
(b.s.) "Six Sigma" A. No Frackin' Way (sc) ... E. Rocket Man?[!] ... I. Over Helming. (sc).
un M bed Ed (sc) ?[!] {?}
3-18-13: Not to leave it, or pun on SNL: nor love it. R we LOL in the same boat? As for Heading
*: dimentionalism(sic) -
lede : (b.s.)tetra+heed+run - A.,B.,C.,D.,G.,H.,I.
or : (b.s.) lede+or+ship - A., ... . N. Walking the Plank[!] (s.c.)
ship : (b.s.) share+n+angle -
? : (b.s.) tetrahedron of will -
focus : (b.s.) Hume A. Third Times a Charm. B. He said *a fowl*!
on : (b.s.) Hume+or+us / Humorism
Pythagorean : Pythagorean - A Place to Ponder
Socratic : Socratics. - (b.s.)Kant+Hegel
published today 3-18-13
3-20-13 Curve Balls? (b.s.)Curve+Balls: A., B., C., D. / Original Intent and Spin.
3-22-13 Scroll over, and only "Physics" had been read at time of post. Post Physics? / Un Try
Angles?
3-28-13 Absolut(ist)ly - "clothing" (b.s.)robin+hood: RawMoney Runnin', Genre Clash (sc), Fair and Balanced... (sc) / divide**: At what point is (pun and rap on justice/scales and founding docs) / "absolutist"(b.s.)absolutism : At what point is , Primary Boogeyman. / win or lose (b.s.)former(pop+culture): A.(sc), B., C., D., E., F., G., Slash Segue(sc), The Billy Club...(sc), A generous dia-Gnosis.(sc)., FAUX CULTIAN? (sc), Close Enough for(sc), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, M(m)., N(n), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, P., Q.(q). latter (b.s.)boogeyman: Primary Boogeyman, B., C., Bottom Line Update(sc), Juxta-Boogey (sc)
VFW:Virtue Freedom War? Rhetoric, Logic, Grammar ? [!]
(b.s.) "S.E.(vi)" A. (fn)FOR D... , B. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy , C. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)].
(b.s.) "Six Sigma" A. No Frackin' Way (sc) ... E. Rocket Man?[!] ... I. Over Helming. (sc).
un M bed Ed (sc) ?[!] {?}
3-18-13: Not to leave it, or pun on SNL: nor love it. R we LOL in the same boat? As for Heading
*: dimentionalism(sic) -
lede : (b.s.)tetra+heed+run - A.,B.,C.,D.,G.,H.,I.
or : (b.s.) lede+or+ship - A., ... . N. Walking the Plank[!] (s.c.)
ship : (b.s.) share+n+angle -
? : (b.s.) tetrahedron of will -
focus : (b.s.) Hume A. Third Times a Charm. B. He said *a fowl*!
on : (b.s.) Hume+or+us / Humorism
Pythagorean : Pythagorean - A Place to Ponder
Socratic : Socratics. - (b.s.)Kant+Hegel
published today 3-18-13
3-20-13 Curve Balls? (b.s.)Curve+Balls: A., B., C., D. / Original Intent and Spin.
3-22-13 Scroll over, and only "Physics" had been read at time of post. Post Physics? / Un Try
Angles?
3-28-13 Absolut(ist)ly - "clothing" (b.s.)robin+hood: RawMoney Runnin', Genre Clash (sc), Fair and Balanced... (sc) / divide**: At what point is (pun and rap on justice/scales and founding docs) / "absolutist"(b.s.)absolutism : At what point is , Primary Boogeyman. / win or lose (b.s.)former(pop+culture): A.(sc), B., C., D., E., F., G., Slash Segue(sc), The Billy Club...(sc), A generous dia-Gnosis.(sc)., FAUX CULTIAN? (sc), Close Enough for(sc), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, M(m)., N(n), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, P., Q.(q). latter (b.s.)boogeyman: Primary Boogeyman, B., C., Bottom Line Update(sc), Juxta-Boogey (sc)
VFW:Virtue Freedom War? Rhetoric, Logic, Grammar ? [!]
Thursday, January 03, 2013
Clog Alert!
Not to Ribble, but regarding two points here:
The tenor of Bane Or.
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)
A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.
Further parse N later ... [^]
^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ? w h ?
[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat" RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn? i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*
^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *
The tenor of Bane Or.
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)
A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.
Further parse N later ... [^]
^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ? w h ?
[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat" RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn? i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*
^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Who the heck...
took the W off of wholistic?
Must have seem him coming. Can we have it back? W?
Odd works in strange and myterious ways, or I made a mistake. Or someone has a sense of humor. Note the odd G oh d another {o}ops! Ok, its me. I was avoiding the G word. By George or Rather letter. See Dan or CBS.
But back to the way this worked, I thought it would be funny to post this on wholism or was it wholistic, since my first search came out with 36,300,000 and I wanted to tweak that by one, but when I refreshed the search engine instead of 36 million 300 thousand and one, it dropped to 57,000 for wholistic and if that is not better, there are still 21,100 for wholism.
But I digress, or progress, it remains why wholism is a variant on holism. It turns out that it may be a long battle at least at this point over Words. Suffice to say for now that for our health we bridge the gap between the whole and the hole.
[Non sequitur - or might it? *]
* akin to footnotes?
[The best I can wiki-google is that 1929 was when holism was spelled first, while some may believe in the power of spells, it seems that words have always been a field that yields.]
[not such]
[Happy End of Year and Hope for a New Air-or]
Must have seem him coming. Can we have it back? W?
Odd works in strange and myterious ways, or I made a mistake. Or someone has a sense of humor. Note the odd G oh d another {o}ops! Ok, its me. I was avoiding the G word. By George or Rather letter. See Dan or CBS.
But back to the way this worked, I thought it would be funny to post this on wholism or was it wholistic, since my first search came out with 36,300,000 and I wanted to tweak that by one, but when I refreshed the search engine instead of 36 million 300 thousand and one, it dropped to 57,000 for wholistic and if that is not better, there are still 21,100 for wholism.
But I digress, or progress, it remains why wholism is a variant on holism. It turns out that it may be a long battle at least at this point over Words. Suffice to say for now that for our health we bridge the gap between the whole and the hole.
[Non sequitur - or might it? *]
* akin to footnotes?
[The best I can wiki-google is that 1929 was when holism was spelled first, while some may believe in the power of spells, it seems that words have always been a field that yields.]
[not such]
[Happy End of Year and Hope for a New Air-or]
Saturday, February 01, 2014
FEBRUARY FOOTNOTES PAGE 2014
2-26-14 : Pop Culture 4thD Forward
(Ironically) , (- Coin-age
of the day., b, c, Fear
and Running, It
is about time... -, Dimentionalism(sic)
-, Over
Helming. -, Place
Holder? -) , [nature: A., B., C., D. 9/11
Shade of the Bush, E. The
links that connect, F. i.e.
S.E. (vi) edgy , G. ROW
MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]]
Footnotes Pages: Anachronisms earlier this month.
Footnotes Pages: Anachronisms earlier this month.
Sunday, July 08, 2012
Who Let the Dogs Out?
Original reaction: Not to Second Guess.
This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]
7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]
Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes: Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views. Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation. We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more. [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way]. People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them. We should agree to do what we agree on! [poor 1%, 2% 3%] One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election. You are the ones driving the economy. Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.
* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]
[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo! Deficit distraction or key?]
[Bingo was his dog! NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots. I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie. It is math warfare. But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]
** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')
*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)
[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down. But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]
This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]
7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]
Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes: Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views. Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation. We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more. [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way]. People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them. We should agree to do what we agree on! [poor 1%, 2% 3%] One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election. You are the ones driving the economy. Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.
* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]
[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo! Deficit distraction or key?]
[Bingo was his dog! NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots. I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie. It is math warfare. But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]
** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')
*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)
[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down. But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]
Friday, July 12, 2002
i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
[Post dated 7-12-12]
[7-19-12 Anachronistic Caution * ! ]
Tetra Heed Run?
[7-19-12 Anachronistic Caution * ! ]
Tetra Heed Run?
Speaking of Tetras, not the fish.
(Not to mention NOW, "there, there". Romney Files.)
T for Bane or, E for Cain, Tr for Issa and A for Priebus?
i.e. Raw Money the 5th Elephant or L-lament?
Re: the Tetra Heed Ron, the I Ron Knee of the BOron or MoRon?
Ne BO*Son re:Biden
Re: Paragons v. Paragones
Re: Models v. Meta4s
(Not exactly) Re: Caricatures and Labels
Note that the third image is my original in[!]tent or rather Platonic Tetra Heed Run[!].
[!]= sarcasm/satire paragon/paragone thing
The top two tetrahedron are later labeling, but may also represent a die-caught-o'me,
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Ghost Busters
Every thing is PC. (Politically Conceptual)
Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)
* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14
F'n anachronism: i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.
Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)
* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14
F'n anachronism: i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.
[anachronistic construction of this post, the indicated youtube(*) was not fully viewed at insert]
Tan gents ? STOP! These inserts are like judging a blog by my model. I have only viewed one of them. Or in computer lingo GOTO line one. Here I will jump to a missing link, not to practice*** quantum effects***. Dimensions are not dimentions without a perspective. (Un-M-String from Slice of Pi^)**
** hit pause @ 0:13(4M theory?)
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Descartes Be4 D...
...hoRsemen.
i.e.
* a tangent for vulnerables minds? (i.e. different ePH words)
~
Wait, I just may have fallen into a legend trap***, ergo Decartes grid-Locke[?]
Anyway, this 3-Minute Philosophy on St. Thomas Aquinas to my listening three times, did not have the -uck word, but might still be awkward to some.
OW
~
ergo: Link 1, Decartes wiki, 2, grammar-monster 3. R-rated 3mPh "Decartes" 4. B.S. on E. G.
*1. PG-rated 3mPh "Aquinas" 2. G-rated YouTube "Mill" 3. :-) -rated YouTube "Mill" 3. P
** inserted link on hold.(The pun was a Wolf in Hitchens form)
e.g.
***
/ ->A Tale of Two Manicheans.
Cultural Threads are Fine.
Know B.S ? ! Evangelii Gaudium !
Tuesday, March 03, 2015
More Gill Let?
More Flex-balls ?
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?
M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?
[image tbi ]
more cowbell
[image tbi ] ( )
[finally/gnot exactly]
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]
i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^) The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?
Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (. . .)
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?
M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?
[image tbi ]
[image tbi ] ( )
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]
i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^) The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?
Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (. . .)
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Change Logos
There were a couple issues that I seem to have been recently premptive** on, which Chris Hayes* seems to have intersected. Actually in regard to changes, it was in regard to the tetrahedron. Speaking of aster risks ... I could work on mine.
Facetious Replacement Logo: The Washington UV's. The Un-Vespuccians.
*'n MSNBC
** to list later
*** (which I did not go All In with) /At least to the point of sharing on facebook.
[Last item was found on my desktop dated March 10th.]
Monday, May 12, 2014
Foe Cult
Benghazi
GOP 4mat
Nye/SE
4Mu(oo)L8 [?]
fn
Re:Hegel
There is a tendency, if not a nature to understand things through a model of one's own understanding. That does not say whether one can or can't(I will avoid Kant) understand another's model, or whether one needs to understandanother's(anyone's) to get somewhere. But recognition of the thesis, antithesis, and synthesis(~process~), does not obviate, prove, solve or even have a point.
iiiIII COh?
(5-13-14edit, ~add~)
GOP 4mat
Nye/SE
4Mu(oo)L8 [?]
fn
Re:Hegel
There is a tendency, if not a nature to understand things through a model of one's own understanding. That does not say whether one can or can't(I will avoid Kant) understand another's model, or whether one needs to understand
iiiIII COh?
(5-13-14
Sunday, June 23, 2024
Tetrahedral log: Page One
Page One https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/09/this-will-start-with-backlog-of.html
Stumbled upon*: My response to Terrence Howard.
By Neil deGrasse Tyson
https://youtu.be/1uLi1I3G2N4?si=FCWNGUTmmB6fkEoY
Pardon my neglect in maintaining my skills in blog construction. Hopefully it is needless to say that I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson and appreciate his perspective, intelligence and patience in addressing the piece submitted to him. I would certainly be happy if I had such input. Not that I have made any clear claims that may be disputed or tested. **
https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html
Post under construction:
Tetrahedron Model
https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Tetrahedron
Bingo! I must credit a partial reading of The Republic, by Plato and my report on it which involved a tetrahedral pillar. This is my theory of everything ...of sorts.
https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/ie-se-vi-edgy.html
* used before finding out a site by that name existed
** I use a semi-conscious and semi-scientific method[!]
[!] : indicates or punctuates play of words or intended pun.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Who are they calling
Economists? Or what the bleap-
do we know? (or they? Post-Laughing Stockman.)
And speaking of who's calling it? Whose thumbing it?
[Speaking of append-ages.]
[anachron(plug)istas]
[Yesterday Norman Goldman sat in for Ed Schultz and today it was Jack Rice, so I plug the former into anacron()ista which I had to see if I had coined. Meanwhile, to Jack: Afganistan, corruption and incompetence, capitalism and diplomacy*, naivete and too cunning by half, what's new, and what's knew, and won can ponder.]
* morphed(well, not exactly**) cover word: governance, governing, bottom line, the people, think globally, act locally.(OK, this is less than circumspect, but the key words R "warlords" and "tribal" culture. See the drift?
** bait and switch(now that's the ticket)
[Get R Out= (R)Evolution]
do we know? (or they? Post-Laughing Stockman.)
And speaking of who's calling it? Whose thumbing it?
[Speaking of append-ages.]
[anachron(plug)istas]
[Yesterday Norman Goldman sat in for Ed Schultz and today it was Jack Rice, so I plug the former into anacron()ista which I had to see if I had coined. Meanwhile, to Jack: Afganistan, corruption and incompetence, capitalism and diplomacy*, naivete and too cunning by half, what's new, and what's knew, and won can ponder.]
* morphed(well, not exactly**) cover word: governance, governing, bottom line, the people, think globally, act locally.(OK, this is less than circumspect, but the key words R "warlords" and "tribal" culture. See the drift?
** bait and switch(now that's the ticket)
[Get R Out= (R)Evolution]
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Tacky, tact, tack...
Who let the Dogfish* out?
Apology Cruise?
* not exactly [!]
Apology Cruise? First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman. A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice. Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark". Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain.
** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^
^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann
[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu? AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]
Apology Cruise?
* not exactly [!]
Apology Cruise? First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman. A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice. Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark". Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain.
** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^
^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann
[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu? AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]
Tuesday, January 01, 2013
(fn)FOR D...
JAN 2012 FOOTNOTE PAGE FOUR
1-3-13 The time and comment escapes me, not to mention* clogs**.
*Ironically(and indubitably) Perry is Right! (Scroll Click)
ROF, WOF
**SC(scroll click)(done)
(part two)
not4knot ornaught...
Budget Bandits?
DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE (INCOMPLETE)
Clear Eyes,
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
A Triangle
First Sources $what does that mean?$
Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!] (sc) or that?
Long Story (D-algorithm?)scroll over
Work is a four letter word. (ouch)
Everything on the table? (that's what I'm $alking about?)
Who's counting?
Emergency (Iraq) Supplemental Passes Senate: 51-47 (SC?)
One man, one vote for knot?
i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
$not to cut it too corny or wonky, in terms of (fn) 5th Sense, but there is something fishy with the headings and scroll overs as I roll out the (b.s.) for "knot". Was it a my plan or the in-"F"-able that the 4F were anomolies not to mention the Supplemental?
1-3-13 The time and comment escapes me, not to mention* clogs**.
*Ironically(and indubitably) Perry is Right! (Scroll Click)
ROF, WOF
**SC(scroll click)(done)
(part two)
not4knot ornaught...
Budget Bandits?
DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE (INCOMPLETE)
Clear Eyes,
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
A Triangle
First Sources $what does that mean?$
Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!] (sc) or that?
Long Story (D-algorithm?)scroll over
Work is a four letter word. (ouch)
Everything on the table? (that's what I'm $alking about?)
Who's counting?
Emergency (Iraq) Supplemental Passes Senate: 51-47 (SC?)
One man, one vote for knot?
i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
$not to cut it too corny or wonky, in terms of (fn) 5th Sense, but there is something fishy with the headings and scroll overs as I roll out the (b.s.) for "knot". Was it a my plan or the in-"F"-able that the 4F were anomolies not to mention the Supplemental?
Friday, March 26, 2010
Media Matters
MSNBC let up on Glenn Beck!
They (oops)
O'Donnell/Maddow
Speaking of seque/oops or other sources or cue.
[A funny think happened on the way to Media Matters]
[3-30-10: For the life of me, I could not figure out what the trip was here, until I'd rewoven a bit of my phrasing and links. It is also in the "journalistic" gimmick? Of teasing punctuations. Tantalizing or probing & rhetorical headlines are more "normally" ended with question marx(sic). But my finally found point was that MSNBC was slightly less than probing and maybe with too fair and balanced intentions.]
They (oops)
O'Donnell/Maddow
Speaking of seque/oops or other sources or cue.
[A funny think happened on the way to Media Matters]
[3-30-10: For the life of me, I could not figure out what the trip was here, until I'd rewoven a bit of my phrasing and links. It is also in the "journalistic" gimmick? Of teasing punctuations. Tantalizing or probing & rhetorical headlines are more "normally" ended with question marx(sic). But my finally found point was that MSNBC was slightly less than probing and maybe with too fair and balanced intentions.]
Monday, July 02, 2012
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Speaking of Strategy
and this time I was.
Often times my colloquial tangents are "out of the Blue" so to speak.
But Daily KOS suggests a strategy that demonstrates to me the pitfalls of primaries if not the complexity of correcting the political process. Well not the strategy per se, but the fact that there is one and it can happen regardless of other circumstances. Meaning I do not know if the history noted involves the same problem that Michigan has created for itself in trying to be an earlier primary, resulting in the dropping out of several Democrats. I think not.
I would not like to see Democrats participate in the same underhanded tactics that Republicans use, but if independents wish to play that game I would hope that they would pick the candidate that they would prefer to actually vote for in the General Election. Not that it is a game and not that it has not been complicated by problems Democrats initiated. Having said that as a Democrat who believes in pushing and pulling to the left, I would respect voters who would push and pull to the right, and that should mean Ron Paul, rather than play the game that Unity '08 tried.
[1-16-08: belated labels and link (below)]
Often times my colloquial tangents are "out of the Blue" so to speak.
But Daily KOS suggests a strategy that demonstrates to me the pitfalls of primaries if not the complexity of correcting the political process. Well not the strategy per se, but the fact that there is one and it can happen regardless of other circumstances. Meaning I do not know if the history noted involves the same problem that Michigan has created for itself in trying to be an earlier primary, resulting in the dropping out of several Democrats. I think not.
I would not like to see Democrats participate in the same underhanded tactics that Republicans use, but if independents wish to play that game I would hope that they would pick the candidate that they would prefer to actually vote for in the General Election. Not that it is a game and not that it has not been complicated by problems Democrats initiated. Having said that as a Democrat who believes in pushing and pulling to the left, I would respect voters who would push and pull to the right, and that should mean Ron Paul, rather than play the game that Unity '08 tried.
[1-16-08: belated labels and link (below)]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)